Use the Search facility to find fascinating facts about this unique molecule, HOCl

Cost Analysis of Pure Hypochlorous Acid Preserved Wound Cleanser versus Mafenide for the Irrigation of Burn Wounds

Source

Rizzo, E. J., Mallow, P. J., Noble, A. J., & Foster, K.Cost Analysis of Pure Hypochlorous Acid Preserved Wound Cleanser versus Mafenide for the Irrigation of Burn WoundsClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research, 16, 747–752. https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S476201

Date

2024

Abstract

Each year, over 40,000 burn patients in the US need hospitalization, with treatment costs over $6,000 per day. Wound irrigation is an important step, but the cost-effectiveness of different methods is unclear. This study compared two treatments: pure hypochlorous acid (pHA) and mafenide solution. The study found that pHA was safer and more cost-effective, saving hospitals an average of $133 per patient over 14 days. Therefore, pHA could be a cost-saving option for burn treatment.

 

 

 

Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published